IAS 8 para 29, IAS 1 para 10(f), prior year adjustment for error, disclosures, third balance sheet, management commentary

BT Group plc – Annual report – 31 March 2017

Industry: telecoms

Review of the year (extract)

Our investigation into our Italian business

What we found

In the summer of 2016 we received a whistle-blower report of inappropriate behaviours in our Italian business. We instigated an investigation, which included an independent review by KPMG LLP, with support and oversight from our Legal, Governance & Compliance function and Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, reporting directly to both the chair of the Audit & Risk Committee and BT Group chairman, and our own comprehensive balance sheet review, which revealed improper accounting practices and a complex set of improper sales, purchase, factoring and leasing transactions in our Italian business. The investigation identified collusion, circumvention and override of controls within our Italian business that was not identified by our monitoring controls thereby resulting in the misstatement of results going undetected for a number of years.

These activities resulted in the overstatement of profits amounting to £268m in our Italian business over a number of years. We concluded that the errors were not individually material to any of the group’s previously issued financial statements; however, we did conclude that the correction of the full £268m in the current year would materially misstate the current year. To avoid this we corrected the errors by revising prior year income statements, balance sheets and cash flow statements. The effect of these revisions is set out in note 1 to the financial statements.

The findings from the investigation in Italy led us to review the carrying value of the assets and liabilities on the balance sheet, taking into account changes in facts or circumstances since 31 March 2016 and whether additional exposures had arisen due to events in the current year. This exercise required a level of judgement, in many cases taking a more cautious view based on our current understanding of circumstances surrounding each item. This exercise concluded that it was appropriate to write-down the value of our balance sheet assets and increase our balance sheet liabilities. The resulting charge of £245m is presented as a specific item in the current year.

Changes in facts or circumstance of items arising in the current year have been recorded in Global Services’ current year trading results.

How we responded

The inappropriate behaviour in our Italian business is an extremely serious matter. It has no place in BT and we took immediate steps to improve the financial processes and controls in that business. We suspended a number of BT Italy’s senior management team who have now left the business. The president of our European operations has also left the business.

We have appointed a new president of our European operations and a new CEO and CFO of BT Italy, from outside the Italian executive management team, and they are working hard to reposition and restructure the business for the future including implementing improvements to the governance, compliance and control culture and the capabilities of our people in the organisation.

To ensure independence, KPMG and our internal investigation team, with support and oversight from the Legal, Governance & Compliance function and Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, reporting directly to both the chair of the Audit & Risk Committee and BT Group chairman, conducted an investigation of the systems and controls relating to our Italian business. We also conducted a broader review of financial processes, systems and controls across the group. We are acting on both the recommendations of KPMG and our own observations and have taken steps to improve our controls within Italy. We have also taken steps to enhance the wider controls that monitor our overseas operations in our shared service centres, Global Services and at a group level.

Beyond Italy, we have completed detailed balance sheet reviews in seven selected country operations in Global Services outside of the UK. These thorough reviews were supported by EY. Together with the investigation in Italy these covered around two-thirds by asset value of the operations outside the UK, representing 4% of the group’s total assets. Our review did not identify any similar issues or areas of concern elsewhere giving us comfort that the inappropriate behaviours were isolated to Italy. This along with other additional substantive assurance activities that we have undertaken enables us to conclude that the financial results and balance sheet as of 31 March 2017 position give a true and fair view of the group.

As a result of our US listing we are required to make certain assessments of our controls as of 31 March 2017 for the purposes of the US Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 (Sarbanes-Oxley). Despite the remediation steps we took, the controls had not operated for sufficient time to allow assurance testing to confirm their effectiveness under Sarbanes-Oxley. We have therefore concluded for these purposes that our controls were ineffective as of 31 March 2017 due to a material weakness with regards to our Italian business.

The BT Group Remuneration Committee has also considered the wider implications of the BT Italy investigation; see page 122 for further details.

What we will do going forward

While we have taken steps to improve our control environment, we recognise we have more to do. We will continue to take steps to improve further our control, governance and compliance environment. These steps include increasing the resources and improving the capabilities of the controlling function and the audit function outside the UK, and further developing our integrated risk and assurance reporting processes. We are also enhancing our controls and compliance programme to strengthen awareness of the standards we expect, the capabilities of our people, and to reinforce the importance of doing business in an ethical, disciplined and standardised way.

The new CEO and CFO of BT Italy will continue to review the Italian management and finance teams and work with BT Group Ethics and Compliance to improve the governance, compliance and financial safeguards. Going forward, we will also continue to rotate senior management among countries to ensure an independently governed and rigorously controlled organisation throughout all parts of Global Services.

  1. Basis of preparation (extract)

Prior year revision and re-classifications (extract)

Investigation into our Italian business

During the year our investigations into our Italian business have revealed inappropriate behaviour and improper accounting practices. The improper practices included a complex set of improper sales, purchase, factoring and leasing transactions.

The effect of the prior years’ errors on the income statement, balance sheet and cash flow statements for the prior periods is set out in the Summary on pages 173 to 176. In total we identified prior period errors that amounted to a £268m reduction in total equity in our 31 March 2016 balance sheet.

The prior years’ errors have resulted from profits, and therefore equity, being overstated for a number of years. These errors affected the Consolidated Group Balance Sheets and Consolidated Group Income Statements included in the Annual Report and Form 20-F for a number of years including the years ended 31 March 2016 and 31 March 2015, and in each of the quarterly results announcements of those years. We have concluded that errors were not material to these or any other of the group’s previously issued financial statements.

We have also assessed whether the correction of the cumulative effect of these errors in the current year would be material to the current year and concluded that correcting these in the current year would be material. Therefore we consider it appropriate to correct the errors by revising the prior years to avoid mis-stating the current year.

We also made changes in estimates resulting from the reassessment of the financial position and outlook for the Italian business amounting to £245m. This is presented within specific items in the year given its size and one-off nature. See note 8.

Revised presentation of cash pooling arrangements

An IFRIC clarification on IAS 32 ‘Financial Instruments presentation Offsetting and cash pooling arrangements’ was released in April 2016. This confirmed a requirement to gross up cash and overdraft balances associated with notional cash pooling arrangements when there is no intention to settle the period end balance.

As a result we revised the comparative balance sheet at 31 March 2016. The impact is to increase cash and cash equivalents and short-term loans and other borrowings by £499m at 31 March 2016 and £414m at 31 March 2015.

EE purchase price accounting

IFRS 3 ‘Business Combinations’ allows us to recognise provisional fair values if the initial accounting for the business combination is incomplete. In the period ended 31 March 2016, we reported that the fair vales recognised for our 29 January 2016 acquisition of EE were provisional. The fair values were to be finalised over a period not exceeding one year from the acquisition date. During the year, we’ve finalised our assessment within the measurement period. This resulted in a revision to previously recognised brand, customer relationships and prepaid assets. Our reassessment also resulted in a net decrease in trade and other receivables and an increase in provisions related to unfavourable contracts. We also received a £20m refund from the previous owners of EE following the finalisation of the audit of the completion balance sheet. The net impact of the adjustments including the deferred tax effect resulted in an increase in goodwill of £29m as of 31 March 2016 with no material impact on the income statement. See note 14.

Summary of adjustments

The following tables reconcile the 31 March 2016 and 31 March 2015 financial years from previously published to the revised position reflecting the three prior year revisions. All subsequent comparative information has been revised accordingly.

bt1

a After specific items, which are defined on page 252.

bt2

bt3

bt4

bt5

a See note 1.

bt6

a The allotted, called up, and fully paid ordinary share capital of BT Group plc at 31 March 2017 was £499m comprising 9,968,127,681 ordinary shares of 5p each (2016: £499m comprising 9,968,127,681) ordinary shares of 5p each.

b The share premium account, comprising the premium on allotment of shares, is not available for distribution.

c For further analysis of own shares, see note 21.

d The merger reserve balance at 1 April 2015 arose on the group reorganisation that occurred in November 2001 and represented the difference between the nominal value of shares in the new parent company, BT Group plc, and the aggregate of the share capital, share premium account and capital redemption reserve of prior parent company, British Telecommunications plc. On 29 January 2016, the company issued 1,594,900,429 ordinary shares of 5p at 470.7p per share. These shares were used as part consideration for the acquisition of EE. As a result of this transaction the merger reserve was credited with £7,424m net of £3m issue costs. In 2016/17, there was a transfer of £1,775m of merger reserve to realised profit following the settlement of an intercompany loan by qualifying consideration.

e For further analysis of other reserves, see note 28.

f Revised, see note 1.

g On 12 February 2015, the company issued 222,000,223 ordinary shares of 5p at 455p per share, raising £1,000m net of issue costs. Share capital increased by £11m and share premium by £989m.

h On 29 January 2016, the company issued 1,594,900,429 ordinary shares of 5p at 470.7p per share, raising £7,504m net of issue costs. Share capital increased by £80m and merger reserve by £7,424m.

Advertisements